Gmail advertisers want lower ratesMay 11, 2004 According to survey results released today by Mosaic Media, 57.1 percent of Google AdWords advertisers want their ads to appear contextually in Google’s Gmail. Gmail is Google’s free e-mail service that is currently in beta testing and is expected to go into full release this summer. Google intends to place contextual advertising in personal e-mails, so if someone is talking about taking a trip to Vermont, hotel ads may show up alongside the text. In Mosaic Media’s survey, only 19 percent of Google advertisers gave a flat no to the concept of their ads appearing in personal Gmail correspondence. The survey revealed, however, that advertisers don’t want to pay as much for Gmail ads as they pay for ads that appear alongside search results. Only 30 percent said they are willing to pay the same cost-per-click (CPC) as they pay for search-results ads. A full 50 percent said no to idea of paying the same rate as search ads. But if the rates are lower for Gmail, advertisers like the idea. Sixty nine percent say they would try Gmail at a lower CPC. And like good direct marketers, 69 percent would design a separate campaign for Gmail. Most of the respondents are active Google advertisers. A small percentage of respondents are not currently Google advertisers but plan to launch a Google campaign in the near future. The bulk of the respondents, 46.2 percent, sell goods or services to both consumers and businesses. Thirty one percent were business-to-consumer only, while 18 percent conduct business-to-business trade only. Google announced the beta testing of Gmail on April 1. The announcement was followed by a storm of controversy about whether the placement of contextual ads in personal e-mails constitutes an intrusion on privacy. Some claim that when you receive something for free, privacy violations don’t count. Some survey respondents were queasy about the privacy implications, with one advertiser saying, “The negative fallout from the invasiveness of this type of advertising is dangerous.” Other respondents characterized Gmail as a misstep for Google. “It’s like ads on eggs. Who needs them?” Most respondents expressed an interest in trying Gmail as long as the costs were not equal to search engine ad rates. “It sounds very targeted to me,” said one respondent. Another noted that an ad that appears in search results is more valuable since the searcher is seeking results. “Gmail should be less expensive since it’s not like a search in which information is being requested.” Source: Search Engine Journal Read Serge Thibodeau's daily blogs on search engines at Serge Thibodeau Live. We strongly suggest you bookmark our web site by clicking here. Tired of receiving unwanted spam in your in box? Get SpamArrest™ and put a stop to all that SPAM. Click here and get rid of SPAM forever! Get your business or company listed in the Global Business Listing directory and increase your business. It takes less then 24 hours to get a premium listing in the most powerful business search engine there is. Click here to find out all about it. Rank for $ales strongly recommends the use of WordTracker to effectively identify all your right industry keywords. Accurate identification of the right keywords and key phrases used in your industry is the first basic step in any serious search engine optimization program. Click here to start your keyword and key phrase research. You can link to the Rank for Sales web site as much as you like. Read our section on how your company can participate in our reciprocal link exchange program and increase your rankings in all the major search engines such as Google, AltaVista, Yahoo and all the others. Powered by Sun Hosting Sponsered by Avantex Traffic stats by Site Clicks™Site design by Mtl. Web D. Sponsered by Press Broadcast Sponsered by Blog Hosting.ca Call Rank for Sales toll free from anywhere in the US or Canada: 1-800-631-3221
email: info@rankforsales.com | Home | SEO Tips | SEO Myths | FAQ | SEO News | Articles | Sitemap | Contact | Copyright © Rank for Sales 2003 Terms of use Privacy agreement Legal disclaimer Ce site est disponible en Français |